<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defending Freedom of Speech Thru Gag Orders or Belief Versus Knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/2010/01/11/belief-versus-behavior/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/2010/01/11/belief-versus-behavior/</link>
	<description>over 5 billion neurons served</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 23:39:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: phm</title>
		<link>http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/2010/01/11/belief-versus-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-127100</link>
		<dc:creator>phm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/?p=2632#comment-127100</guid>
		<description>Madeline, I have a friend who is a chemist.  Don&#039;t get him started on &quot;organic.&quot;  The main thing he points out is that some of the nastiest chemicals out there are organic compounds. You have to use care with any chemical, organic or otherwise,

I think the anti-vaxxers are close to beneath contempt.  I know several people who recovered from getting polio and IT CAME BACK when they got to middle age (like the chicken pox virus, it can hang out undetected and inactive in nerve tissue).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Madeline, I have a friend who is a chemist.  Don&#8217;t get him started on &#8220;organic.&#8221;  The main thing he points out is that some of the nastiest chemicals out there are organic compounds. You have to use care with any chemical, organic or otherwise,</p>
<p>I think the anti-vaxxers are close to beneath contempt.  I know several people who recovered from getting polio and IT CAME BACK when they got to middle age (like the chicken pox virus, it can hang out undetected and inactive in nerve tissue).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N.G.</title>
		<link>http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/2010/01/11/belief-versus-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-125474</link>
		<dc:creator>N.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/?p=2632#comment-125474</guid>
		<description>I love how people do not realize that everything &quot;chemical&quot; comes from what we see around us: it&#039;s not like it suddenly appears out of thin air. I mean, aren&#039;t most of the ingredients of medicinal &quot;man-made&quot; cures taken from plants and brewed for greater potency and effectiveness?
Oops, I&#039;m sorry. I forgot -- mixing things together is evil and vindictive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how people do not realize that everything &#8220;chemical&#8221; comes from what we see around us: it&#8217;s not like it suddenly appears out of thin air. I mean, aren&#8217;t most of the ingredients of medicinal &#8220;man-made&#8221; cures taken from plants and brewed for greater potency and effectiveness?<br />
Oops, I&#8217;m sorry. I forgot &#8212; mixing things together is evil and vindictive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madeleine Robins</title>
		<link>http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/2010/01/11/belief-versus-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-123872</link>
		<dc:creator>Madeleine Robins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/?p=2632#comment-123872</guid>
		<description>Steve: you&#039;re right.  I was being tongue in cheek--a parent has a right to inflict faith based medicine only to a point (if the parent wants to cultivate Good Thoughts to deal with her own pesky liver cancer, well, that&#039;s their perogative).  My friend&#039;s sister died a horrible and wholly unnecessary death because her Mom believed that Nature was Best.

This goes sort of hand-in-glove with people I know who believe that anything &quot;natural&quot; is superior to anything &quot;chemical.&quot;  A friend switched to herbal tea when she became pregnant because she didn&#039;t want &quot;caffeine or other chemicals&quot; to hurt the baby.  What she chose to drink was a tea blended with white mint, aka pennyroyal--a known abortifacient.  She almost lost the baby, and felt a powerful sense of betrayal: the natural herbs had turned out to have chemicals in them too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve: you&#8217;re right.  I was being tongue in cheek&#8211;a parent has a right to inflict faith based medicine only to a point (if the parent wants to cultivate Good Thoughts to deal with her own pesky liver cancer, well, that&#8217;s their perogative).  My friend&#8217;s sister died a horrible and wholly unnecessary death because her Mom believed that Nature was Best.</p>
<p>This goes sort of hand-in-glove with people I know who believe that anything &#8220;natural&#8221; is superior to anything &#8220;chemical.&#8221;  A friend switched to herbal tea when she became pregnant because she didn&#8217;t want &#8220;caffeine or other chemicals&#8221; to hurt the baby.  What she chose to drink was a tea blended with white mint, aka pennyroyal&#8211;a known abortifacient.  She almost lost the baby, and felt a powerful sense of betrayal: the natural herbs had turned out to have chemicals in them too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: persky</title>
		<link>http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/2010/01/11/belief-versus-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-123617</link>
		<dc:creator>persky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/?p=2632#comment-123617</guid>
		<description>There is another way that not vaccinating your own children affects everyone&#039;s health.  The rate at which a disease spreads is proportional to the rate at which it is cleared relative to the rate at which it can propagate to a new host.  Therefore, the fraction of the population that is vaccinated can make the difference between a widespread outbreak, a locally contained epidemic, or the erradication of a disease entirely.

Here is an interesting article from Microbe magazine on the percent of the population that would need to be vaccinated in order to obtain &quot;herd immunity&quot; from measles:

http://forms.asm.org/microbe/index.asp?bid=44732</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is another way that not vaccinating your own children affects everyone&#8217;s health.  The rate at which a disease spreads is proportional to the rate at which it is cleared relative to the rate at which it can propagate to a new host.  Therefore, the fraction of the population that is vaccinated can make the difference between a widespread outbreak, a locally contained epidemic, or the erradication of a disease entirely.</p>
<p>Here is an interesting article from Microbe magazine on the percent of the population that would need to be vaccinated in order to obtain &#8220;herd immunity&#8221; from measles:</p>
<p><a href="http://forms.asm.org/microbe/index.asp?bid=44732" rel="nofollow">http://forms.asm.org/microbe/index.asp?bid=44732</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Gould</title>
		<link>http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/2010/01/11/belief-versus-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-123407</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/?p=2632#comment-123407</guid>
		<description>Stan, thanks for the note about affect v. effect.  Will fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stan, thanks for the note about affect v. effect.  Will fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Gould</title>
		<link>http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/2010/01/11/belief-versus-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-123406</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/?p=2632#comment-123406</guid>
		<description>Stan,

As Michael pointed out, government, academic, and medical establishments bent over backwards, spending a LOT of money to examine the claims of anti-vaxxers.  This is not &quot;writing them off as fruitcakes.&quot;

Anecdotal claims are not the basis for making policy decisions.  They often are, though, the basis for &lt;em&gt;starting&lt;/em&gt; serious investigations into a possible effect and that&#039;s what happened.

When people maintain their position in the face of well-established contrary evidence they have certainly walked over the line into fruitcake land but we should definitely continue to discuss the claims, not the people.

Madeleine,

I would actually disagree that parents have the right to make stupid medical decisions about their own children.  A recent case in Australia resulted in the death of an infant whose parents continued to treat eczema with homeopathic cures.  This for a condition easily treated by evidence-based medical practices.  We&#039;re talking a horrible death.  Parenting has responsibilities as well as privileges.  

This is a far more extreme example than deciding not to vaccinate your kids and I know it&#039;s not what you meant.  However, even deciding not vaccinate ones own children has effects on other peoples kids as those unvaccinated kids become vectors to, as you noted, people with weaker immune systems.

Like most things, there&#039;s got to be a balance between our own parental rights and our parental responsibilities, and a balance between our rights that the rights of others.

(I&#039;ve jumped on your sentence to make a point, but I&#039;m pretty sure you agree with me on most of this.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stan,</p>
<p>As Michael pointed out, government, academic, and medical establishments bent over backwards, spending a LOT of money to examine the claims of anti-vaxxers.  This is not &#8220;writing them off as fruitcakes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anecdotal claims are not the basis for making policy decisions.  They often are, though, the basis for <em>starting</em> serious investigations into a possible effect and that&#8217;s what happened.</p>
<p>When people maintain their position in the face of well-established contrary evidence they have certainly walked over the line into fruitcake land but we should definitely continue to discuss the claims, not the people.</p>
<p>Madeleine,</p>
<p>I would actually disagree that parents have the right to make stupid medical decisions about their own children.  A recent case in Australia resulted in the death of an infant whose parents continued to treat eczema with homeopathic cures.  This for a condition easily treated by evidence-based medical practices.  We&#8217;re talking a horrible death.  Parenting has responsibilities as well as privileges.  </p>
<p>This is a far more extreme example than deciding not to vaccinate your kids and I know it&#8217;s not what you meant.  However, even deciding not vaccinate ones own children has effects on other peoples kids as those unvaccinated kids become vectors to, as you noted, people with weaker immune systems.</p>
<p>Like most things, there&#8217;s got to be a balance between our own parental rights and our parental responsibilities, and a balance between our rights that the rights of others.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;ve jumped on your sentence to make a point, but I&#8217;m pretty sure you agree with me on most of this.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madeleine Robins</title>
		<link>http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/2010/01/11/belief-versus-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-123366</link>
		<dc:creator>Madeleine Robins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/?p=2632#comment-123366</guid>
		<description>I firmly support the right of parents to make stupid medical decisions for their children...as long as their stupid medical decisions do not affect the health and well-being of &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; children the kids around them.  And for people with weaker immune systems, anti-vaxxers pose a positive threat.

Years ago I had a friend whose mother went on an anti-vaccination kick.  His sister got &lt;i&gt;tetanus&lt;/i&gt;, something rare enough that no one recognized what it was until she was too sick to save.  Thereafter the mother was firmly in the pro-vaccination camp, but that&#039;s a hell of a lesson to learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I firmly support the right of parents to make stupid medical decisions for their children&#8230;as long as their stupid medical decisions do not affect the health and well-being of <i>my</i> children the kids around them.  And for people with weaker immune systems, anti-vaxxers pose a positive threat.</p>
<p>Years ago I had a friend whose mother went on an anti-vaccination kick.  His sister got <i>tetanus</i>, something rare enough that no one recognized what it was until she was too sick to save.  Thereafter the mother was firmly in the pro-vaccination camp, but that&#8217;s a hell of a lesson to learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Shannon</title>
		<link>http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/2010/01/11/belief-versus-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-123328</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/?p=2632#comment-123328</guid>
		<description>@Stan - as Steven points out, we&#039;ve already done the hard job of figuring out whether there is a nugget of truth there (at least for the anti-vaccine group), and there is not.  There is some very good evidence to explain why some people draw that (erroneous) conclusion, and there have been a number of studies showing no correlation, let alone causation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stan &#8211; as Steven points out, we&#8217;ve already done the hard job of figuring out whether there is a nugget of truth there (at least for the anti-vaccine group), and there is not.  There is some very good evidence to explain why some people draw that (erroneous) conclusion, and there have been a number of studies showing no correlation, let alone causation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/2010/01/11/belief-versus-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-123310</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/?p=2632#comment-123310</guid>
		<description>Belief is, however, a powerful force. Belief that something can be done even though there is evidence to contrary is often the deciding factor that gets it done. 

It is interesting, too, how often people who don&#039;t buy the whole creation and afterlife myth and see organized religion as pinheaded are very quick to toss the baby out with the bathwater. There are social norms and principles of behavior there that have been good for  mankind. That doesn&#039;t mean I need or want the vatican, John Hagee, or Mohammed messing up the government - that is best left to the professionals who have been doing that job very well over the last hundred years or so. But, we don&#039;t need to discount that 10% (or less) that is good and useful there. Same with the anti-vaxxers (but probably not the moon landing deniers), it is mostly hype and hysteria, but there may be some nugget in what they say that actually has a basis in reality. Completely writing them off as fruitcakes is easy. The hard job is finding out whether or not there is a nugget there worth the effort of uncovering it. 

Finally, Strunk &amp; White tell me you might have a little typo there - affect vs effect. It is minor and hyper picky, but it somehow jumps out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belief is, however, a powerful force. Belief that something can be done even though there is evidence to contrary is often the deciding factor that gets it done. </p>
<p>It is interesting, too, how often people who don&#8217;t buy the whole creation and afterlife myth and see organized religion as pinheaded are very quick to toss the baby out with the bathwater. There are social norms and principles of behavior there that have been good for  mankind. That doesn&#8217;t mean I need or want the vatican, John Hagee, or Mohammed messing up the government &#8211; that is best left to the professionals who have been doing that job very well over the last hundred years or so. But, we don&#8217;t need to discount that 10% (or less) that is good and useful there. Same with the anti-vaxxers (but probably not the moon landing deniers), it is mostly hype and hysteria, but there may be some nugget in what they say that actually has a basis in reality. Completely writing them off as fruitcakes is easy. The hard job is finding out whether or not there is a nugget there worth the effort of uncovering it. </p>
<p>Finally, Strunk &amp; White tell me you might have a little typo there &#8211; affect vs effect. It is minor and hyper picky, but it somehow jumps out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline Spector</title>
		<link>http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/2010/01/11/belief-versus-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-123074</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline Spector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/?p=2632#comment-123074</guid>
		<description>Why do these things always remind me of the witch scene from Monty Python and the Holy Grail?

As for Jenny McCarthy and her anti-vaccine zealots, I know that when I want sound medical advice I always choose the chick who shows her titties off in Playboy over say, an actual doctor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do these things always remind me of the witch scene from Monty Python and the Holy Grail?</p>
<p>As for Jenny McCarthy and her anti-vaccine zealots, I know that when I want sound medical advice I always choose the chick who shows her titties off in Playboy over say, an actual doctor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Long</title>
		<link>http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/2010/01/11/belief-versus-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-123059</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatourbrains.com/EoB/?p=2632#comment-123059</guid>
		<description>Uh.  I know that the anti-vaccine people exist.  I never knew how far they would go, or that they were quite *this* stupid.  If not that their kids would pay the price, I&#039;d be all in favor of letting them die out from their own stupid . . . but the kids may learn better, if their parents don&#039;t get them killed.

Nice to see the blog active again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh.  I know that the anti-vaccine people exist.  I never knew how far they would go, or that they were quite *this* stupid.  If not that their kids would pay the price, I&#8217;d be all in favor of letting them die out from their own stupid . . . but the kids may learn better, if their parents don&#8217;t get them killed.</p>
<p>Nice to see the blog active again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

